The reason I have included this question is that many of the homes I have worked in only have two shift patterns, usually 8a.m.-8p.m. and 8p.m.-8a.m. The problem with this is obviously that staff have to work twelve hour shifts. Long days are exhausting in any job, but particularly so in health care, which involves looking after vulnerable people with complex needs. In my experience this can lead to provision of an inadequate level of care.
This may also be detrimental to the clients in the handover of information from one shift to another. This is the crucial time when the team finishing one shift hands over important information to the staff that are about to start. When there are only two shift patterns there is no overlap and handovers are often hasty and less efficient. Having more than two shifts allows staff members to fully concentrate on the information being handed over to them, without having to worry about who is actually looking after the residents.
Many care homes regularly have what is known as Relatives Meetings. This is where relatives and friends of residents can meet at a scheduled time to discuss anything to do with the home, including concerns with any of the staff members (usually but not always the manager). This enables relatives and friends to obtain a holistic view of the home by speaking with other people in a similar position. The meetings might contain complaints, but it is worth putting these into perspective to get an overall view of the home. I can’t think of any reason why a good care home would object to this, with the exception of confidentiality issues and they might well jump at the opportunity if the relatives of a resident are pleased with the level of care their loved one is receiving.
An organisation called the Safe Staffing Alliance recommends that there should never be more than eight patients to one nurse on an acute ward. In my experience, this is a very optimistic figure, and it is ironic that of all the places I have worked it is the NHS homes that have come closest to achieving this ratio. There are no recommendations for staffing levels in care homes. The closer a home is to achieving this ratio the better.
It is an extremely daunting experience for a nurse to arrive at a care home for the first time, only to be handed the medicine keys and be informed that you are the only nurse for the whole day in charge of the welfare of up to 70 residents. Although the recommendations of the Safe Staffing Alliance are not mandatory, I would certainly raise this issue with any prospective home to see if they are aware of it, and if they have any plans on implementing it if it is not already being adhered to.
Regular staff know a lot of valuable information; probably a lot more than they are aware of. This includes such things as a resident’s routine, their likes and dislikes, what they like to eat, and when they like to go to bed. This type of information may seem trivial, but in fact it is vital for the proper running of a home.
When a number of different people work in a home they cannot be familiar with the residents, and they are in need of constant explanation. This can impact on the running of the home if it needs to be done too often. Care homes should really only make use of an agency as a last resort, and you should be concerned if they are used on a frequent basis. This is the type of information that could be found out through attending relatives meetings.
Every care home should have an individual on the staff who is what is known as a ’Clinical Lead.’ Even so, it is the manager who will be making the day to day decisions affecting the running of the home. Thus it is very important that the manager also has some clinical experience. The definition of this is, “relating to the observation and treatment of actual patients rather than theoretical or laboratory studies.” In simple terms this refers to an individual who is (or was) a registered nurse or doctor. If in doubt you can always ask the manager directly. Alternatively you can check this by going to the websites for the General Medical Council (which lists all practising doctors), or the Nursing Midwifery Council (which lists all practising nurses).
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is a body of The Department of Health which regulates and inspects Health and Social Care services in England. This report is often found on the websites of care homes, and grades the home on a number of different areas, such as treating people with respect, staffing levels etc. This report can be deceptive, because the CQC will only be able to obtain a broad overview of a particular home and will not always get the full picture. There are numerous examples of care homes that have been given glowing reports, only to be found later to give shocking care to its residents. Other homes have been given a low rating yet have provided excellent care.
Again this is another question which can be raised at a relatives meeting. If the relatives or friends of a resident confirm that there is a high turnover, and agency staff are used on an alarmingly frequent basis, you have to ask why this is so.
Another thing to look out for is ads for the home reappearing in the ‘Vacancies’ section on the Internet, or in a local paper. Ads that appear week after week, month after month, for the same care home often indicate difficulty in recruiting staff, and again it is worth asking why?
Carers in England receive no formal training for this demanding role. Although it is not mandatory, it is worth asking a potential care home if they provide any assistance for their carers to complete a course in Health and Social Care.
A home that provides opportunities for their staff to progress in this way is likely to be one that also provides good care.
I would always be wary of homes that promise such services as “all care is tailored specifically to an individual’s needs”, or that meal times are “always a unique experience” (what exactly makes for a “unique experience” at meal times?)
Although such optimism is commendable and should always be aimed for it is rarely realistic, and often sounds like the utilisation of buzz words and phrases coined by people who have never actually worked in care.
I have to be honest I have worked in care homes with far less enthusiastic descriptions attached to them which have offered far better care than the ones that do.